Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 15:28
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 267
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 797
73% 611 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$290
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.5% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 177
Parallax 113
95% 135 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 95.8
Splatting 95.6
88% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 57 62 47 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 444
Write 74.5
Mixed 118
SusWrite 54.5
37% 173 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 22.8
94% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 64.4
DQ Mixed 98.4
79% 114 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 121%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
156GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.4% Very poor
Read 41.5
Write 37.8
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 38.4
9% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 13.7
45% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.1
DQ Write 25.3
DQ Mixed 28.2
21% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 99%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB
4GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 405
Write 409
Mixed 368
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 28.3
92% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 208
157% 211 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 97%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
18GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 104 102 112 111 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 95
Mixed 81
SusWrite 104
70% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
2GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 72.5
Write 82
Mixed 83.5
60% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 67%
ADATA HC630 500GB
84GB free, PID a34a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 35.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 35.7
44% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D30AESC.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 34.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 34.8
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $62

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $334
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback