Asus VivoBook E14 E402YA_X402YA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook E14 E402YA_X402YA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E402YA
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 13:45
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-7015 APU R2 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Memory 33.3
1-Core 20.7
2-Core 40.7
20% 31.6 Pts
4-Core 39.5
8-Core 32.1
5% 35.8 Pts
64-Core 35.5
2% 35.5 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Asus(1043 1941) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44.13
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.39% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.39%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07656
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 5.8 26 37 37 27 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 280
Write 53.2
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 28.7
22% 104 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 14.9
60% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 80.2
DQ Write 27.6
DQ Mixed 42.4
34% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5174EB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 1.7
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 236
17% 236 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook E14 E402YA_X402YA Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook E14 E402YA_X402YA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback