NEC PC-VK17HBBCE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNEC PC-VK17HBBCE  (all builds)
MotherboardNEC MS-1252
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120203
Uptime70.8 Days
Run DateMar 24 '22 at 08:50
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2637M
Micro-FCBGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 88.7
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 85.2
52% 77.4 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 151
16% 130 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Device(1BCF A02D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kimmidi TB900 SSD 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 235 237 234 226 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.6% Good
Read 249
Write 209
Mixed 218
SusWrite 230
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 23.7
101% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 86.9
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 45.9
61% 107 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 79%
USB Disk 3.0 32GB
25GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 4.2 14 11 9.5 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.07% Terrible
Read 29.8
Write 1.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 10.9
12% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.07%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 SHARETRONIC 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PC-VK17HBBCE Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: NEC PC-VK17HBBCE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback