PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus Crosshair IV Extreme (all builds) |
Memory | 8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110401 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 25 '17 at 18:47 |
Run Duration | 169 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.6%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.2%
Above average
|
||||
WD Elements 1TB
190GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905403-444.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-444.A00LF 12GB
667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples | 15x |
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 11x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 7x |
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 3x |
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $573 |