HP OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-2XX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-2XX (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 839F
Memory	57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200612
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '22 at 21:47
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9820X-$550 2,515 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 72.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 233 78% 143 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 927 82% 696 Pts	64-Core 1,643 102% 1,643 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% MSI(1462 3897) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4775 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.79 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 138 Reflection 133 Parallax 146 113% 139 fps	Gravity 132 Splatting 141 122% 136 fps
Poor: 162% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 397GB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 451 444 444 444 442 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 463 Mixed 438 SusWrite 446 104% 460 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 84.1 4K Mixed 52.2 170% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 355 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 385GB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 451 444 444 444 442 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 460 Mixed 441 SusWrite 446 104% 460 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 53.3 172% 59.2 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 354 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 137%
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-000H1 1TB 2,641 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 803GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA73H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1385 1189 1193 1181 1162 1017 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	251% Outstanding	Read 1982 Write 1,963 Mixed 1374 SusWrite 1,188 365% 1,627 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 60.1 207% 73.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,009 DQ Write 575 DQ Mixed 796 592% 794 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑ This bench: 251% Great: 317%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 822GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 387 382 382 382 383 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 386 Write 385 Mixed 356 SusWrite 384 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 31.6 103% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 180 125% 157 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OAC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 194 195 196 191 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 181 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 194 108% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/16G 4x16GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.1% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 16.6 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 9.9 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 95 42% 95 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-2XX Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 93%

Nuclear submarine

System: HP OMEN X by HP Desktop PC 900-2XX

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	25x
Core i9-7920XIntel $250Bench 82%, 5,430 samples	21x
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	28x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	18x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	8x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $37Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	20x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	14x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	5x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 2x16GBKingstonBench 86%, 2,002 samples	10x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 4x8GBHynixBench 76%, 2,034 samples	9x
RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 4x8GBRamaxelBench 71%, 222 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $727

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16