Toshiba Satellite L40t-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L40t-A  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA VFKTA
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 23 '22 at 20:30
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 102
51% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 172
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA00) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 2.7
0% 1.5 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 5.8
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.22%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
638GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA2OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 57 50 57 60 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 73.5
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 56.5
39% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 57%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 1GB
0GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 5
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 5.2
8% 6.73 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L40t-A Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L40t-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $136
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback