Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 APEX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 235%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 128%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive445% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 APEX  (all builds)
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '22 at 17:47
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User BHR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 222
2-Core 443
131% 252 Pts
4-Core 878
8-Core 1,763
156% 1,320 Pts
64-Core 3,151
195% 3,151 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 128%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 315
Reflection 282
Parallax 321
257% 306 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 156%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3344 987 967 984 991 994 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
445% Outstanding
Read 3,131
Write 2,617
Mixed 3,137
SusWrite 1,378
576% 2,566 MB/s
4K Read 92.7
4K Write 288
4K Mixed 137
469% 173 MB/s
DQ Read 2,281
DQ Write 1,776
DQ Mixed 2,000
1,504% 2,019 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 445%
Great: 442%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
257GB free
Firmware: 5B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3252 3256 916 725 719 717 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
442% Outstanding
Read 2,893
Write 2,418
Mixed 2949
SusWrite 1,598
554% 2,465 MB/s
4K Read 81.7
4K Write 262
4K Mixed 123
420% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 2,413
DQ Write 2,017
DQ Mixed 2183
1,644% 2,204 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 442%
Great: 442%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF548C38-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
176% Outstanding
MC Read 72.5
MC Write 68.9
MC Mixed 65
197% 68.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 54.5
SC Mixed 27
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 176%
Great: 167%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z690 APEX Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z690 APEX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,084
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback