Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '22 at 06:40
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 95.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 442
61% 452 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 72.5
Reflection 76
Parallax 69.9
59% 72.8 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 68.7
57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 178 156 143 147 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 447
Mixed 402
SusWrite 174
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 51.1
169% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 368
277% 369 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 124%
Yeston Extreme 60G 60GB
15GB free
Firmware: Q1103A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 512
Write 269
Mixed 23.9
58% 268 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 1
89% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 1
51% 120 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 77%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
14GB free
Firmware: LVM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 97 78 74 91 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 48.9
Write 85.5
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 87.8
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 70%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
14GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 116 117 111 106 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 87.6
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 105
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
14GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 70 72 77 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43% Average
Read 78.4
Write 68.7
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 71.1
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GIS 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-1600C11-8GIS 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 18.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 55.7
72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback