Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Memory 26.8 1-Core 23.2 2-Core 45.8 19% 31.9 Pts	4-Core 45.4 8-Core 46 6% 45.7 Pts	64-Core 44.9 3% 44.9 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3904) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.45% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 2.5 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.45% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U512G1001 512GB 547 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 442GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 218 246 252 243 252 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 345 Write 306 Mixed 199 SusWrite 244 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 29.2 94% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 89.1 DQ Mixed 98.8 75% 101 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 39,427 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 5.8 19% 6.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 274 15% 274 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 21%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	15x
Celeron N3150IntelBench 26%, 3,131 samples	13x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	11x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	53x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	13x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	6x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	6x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16