MSI MPG B550I GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C92)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C92
MotherboardMSI MPG B550I GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C92)  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211221
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 23 '22 at 01:46
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 5800X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 178
2-Core 350
108% 204 Pts
4-Core 685
8-Core 1,256
116% 971 Pts
64-Core 2,227
138% 2,227 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 114
Parallax 130
104% 124 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 116
Splatting 106
107% 135 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 282 283 279 279 270 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 492
Mixed 457
SusWrite 293
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 56
188% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
272GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2011 952 787 790 791 787 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,681
Write 2,447
Mixed 1,878
SusWrite 1,020
449% 2,006 MB/s
4K Read 71
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 95.2
316% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,105
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 954
699% 923 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 308%
Great: 355%
External USB3.0 180GB
121GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 130 139 134 137 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43% Average
Read 308
Write 165
Mixed 206
SusWrite 137
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 15.3
58% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 51.1
DQ Mixed 67.8
59% 90.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
234GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 72 76 77 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 60.4
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 74.8
41% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40%
Great: 47%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46
718GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 100 102 102 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 141
Write 139
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 101
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 84%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 184 184 184 183 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 149
Mixed 108
SusWrite 184
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.9
427% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2A2666C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 63.1
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 34
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 33.5
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 115%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG B550I GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C92) Builds (Compare 717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550I GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C92)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $808
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback