QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	43.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '22 at 01:34
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 153 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 55 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 193 63% 116 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 660 61% 510 Pts	64-Core 915 57% 915 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.1% Below average	Lighting 38.7 Reflection 40.4 Parallax 42.3 32% 40.5 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 37.8 Splatting 27 27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$33 33,719 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAXA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 543 455 437 438 398 385 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	159% Outstanding	Read 1,536 Write 931 Mixed 1,260 SusWrite 443 232% 1,042 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 44.3 148% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 618 DQ Write 503 DQ Mixed 456 370% 526 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 216%
Samsung MZ1LB3T8HMLA-00007 4TB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 245% 1TB free Firmware: EDB7202Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 588 598 599 603 560 581 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	143% Outstanding	Read 740 Write 590 Mixed 628 SusWrite 588 143% 637 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 76.7 4K Mixed 45.9 148% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 808 DQ Write 602 DQ Mixed 630 491% 680 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 291%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 3x16GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3 of 3 slots used 48GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	MC Read 43 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 54.7 129% 45 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 24.2 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	141x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	74x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16