MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive340% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C34
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34)  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211227
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 23:49
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 177
2-Core 350
111% 207 Pts
4-Core 684
8-Core 1,298
118% 991 Pts
64-Core 2900
180% 2900 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 1.5TB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2485 1866 1861 1866 1811 1199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 3,695
Write 3,604
Mixed 1,272
SusWrite 1848
581% 2,605 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 47
151% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 850
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 178
281% 543 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 340%
Great: 327%
Amd-raid Array 1 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 124
Write 148
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 101
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.3
633% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 116%
Amd-raid Array 2 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 111
Write 61.7
Mixed 86
SusWrite 97.7
66% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
154% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 62.5
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 42.3
137% 48 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 37.1
90% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 128%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) Builds (Compare 449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback