Lenovo 11DUS73P00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 11DUS73P00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 316E
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 20:23
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 174
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 592
56% 462 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 316E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 7.6
5% 6.47 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA5-8D256-Q79 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6Q279
SusWrite @10s intervals: 864 903 291 339 697 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,907
Write 1,556
Mixed 1372
SusWrite 567
301% 1,351 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 61.2
207% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 895
DQ Write 629
DQ Mixed 780
578% 768 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 209%
Great: 230%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
8GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.6 3.4 3.6 1.6 2.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25
Write 1.5
SusWrite 3.1
8% 9.87 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.4% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 20.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 20.2
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 11DUS73P00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 11DUS73P00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback