Lenovo 20EQS2BH00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20EQS2BH00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EQS2BH00
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 17:11
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 194
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 524
51% 417 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
XFX(1682 3103) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 17.9
15% 18.6 fps
Splatting 11.2
12% 11.2 fps
Poor: 15% Great: 16%
Nvidia Quadro M1000M
Legend(17AA 2230) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.42
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 16
12% 15.9 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 14.8
14% 18 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L6QBXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,235
Write 399
Mixed 467
152% 700 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 43.4
180% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 919
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 265
263% 444 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 243%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
363GB free
Firmware: AX1P4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 80 81 80 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 82.9
Write 78.4
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 80.2
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.8% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 20.7
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 21.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20EQS2BH00 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20EQS2BH00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $31
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback