Alphasync 1415605

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAlphasync 1415605  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B550M-K
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210811
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 14:27
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 278
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 849
87% 700 Pts
64-Core 991
61% 991 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 179
Parallax 168
153% 178 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
118% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP500GM30021 500GB
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STPSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1341 572 494 572 543 497 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,490
Write 2,334
Mixed 1,631
SusWrite 670
346% 1,531 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 58.2
195% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 999
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 890
670% 899 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 201%
Great: 276%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
135GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 103 207 231 138 221 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 454
Write 320
Mixed 278
SusWrite 206
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 18.7
70% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 83.3
DQ Mixed 43.1
48% 82 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 203 213 214 213 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 143
Write 184
Mixed 78.1
SusWrite 209
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
130% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
794GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 129 131 130 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 130
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 84%
WD My Passport 0810 1TB
363GB free, PID 0810
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 83.2
Write 91.8
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 87.4
108% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 45%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
380GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 110 111 110 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
43% Average
Read 88.1
Write 94.9
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 110
119% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43%
Great: 63%
BUFFALO HD-PCU2 320GB
71GB free, PID 01d9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 26 31 34 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 36
Write 20.7
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 28.9
36% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.1
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37.2
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1415605 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

System: Alphasync 1415605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback