Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 167 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 485 55% 430 Pts	64-Core 488 30% 488 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.8 1% 1.8 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 22 24 115 145 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 407 Write 318 Mixed 152 SusWrite 83.3 53% 240 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 6.4 40% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 51.4 DQ Mixed 36.6 40% 68.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5773DH0- 4x2GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	85.4% Excellent	MC Read 32 MC Write 35.9 MC Mixed 30.8 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.8 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	3x
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	1x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	1x

RAM
9JSF25672PZ-1 4x2GBMicronBench 77%, 9 samples	2x
M393B5773DH0- 4x2GBSamsungBench 83%, 13 samples	1x
F3 DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 41%, 3,080 samples	1x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $365

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16