TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Aftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 10:45
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 232
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 590
62% 496 Pts
64-Core 727
45% 727 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 83.1%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 95E6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 6.5
4% 6.47 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.7
6% 7.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 5.1%
 Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Clevo(1558 95E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 108
Parallax 110
84% 107 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 102
Splatting 94.5
91% 114 fps
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 86.6%
 Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
471GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1484 1404 1417 1412 1418 1426 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,084
Write 1,678
Mixed 1,344
SusWrite 1,427
366% 1,633 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 81.6
268% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,162
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 952
715% 965 MB/s
Poor: 185% ↑
This bench: 297%
 Great: 355%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
759GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 92 93 93 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 87.9
Write 92.1
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 92.7
61% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
172% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 52.2%
 Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGS88C-26N1900 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 26.9
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 25.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 87.3%
 Great: 90%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical P95_96_97Ex,Rx Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Aftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples13x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples9x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples11x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples6x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples4x
SSD
CRAS C710 M.2 NVMe SSD 512GBKlevvBench 184%, 1,830 samples4x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples3x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples3x
RAM
IM48GS88N26-GIIHA0 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 88 samples5x
KD48GS88A-26N1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 76%, 71 samples4x
9905712-035.A00G 1x16GBKingstonBench 44%, 217 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback