TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory15.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 09:35
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 213
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 626
62% 506 Pts
64-Core 794
49% 794 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 74.4%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
XFX(1682 5501)
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 97.3
56% 77.5 fps
MRender 54.3
Gravity 76.2
Splatting 44.1
46% 58.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 52.6%
 Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s16 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 44 61 37 54 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 588
Write 309
Mixed 272
SusWrite 58.3
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 7.4
56% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 92.6
109% 183 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 53.2%
 Great: 244%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
65GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 173 170 174 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 121
Write 105
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 174
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 84.7%
 Great: 113%
Seagate ST6000NE0023-2EX110 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 120 117 123 123 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 Kingston KHX2666C16/8G TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 20.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 20.7
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 59.2%
 Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples1,442x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples1,324x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $175Bench 74%, 142,983 samples563x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples505x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples430x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples428x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples204x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples174x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples167x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples420x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples275x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples251x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback