Positivo VJFE52F11X-XXXXXX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPositivo VJFE52F11X-XXXXXX  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJFE-CL
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 07:08
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 150
68% 110 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 209
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0C-00AJM0 480GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231800WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 707 219 230 225 233 234 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,430
Write 1470
Mixed 1,138
SusWrite 308
243% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 66.2
238% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 740
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 406
335% 490 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 173%
Great: 226%
Smart SZ9STE 2.5 7mm 128GB
115GB free
Firmware: EXT06D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 135 135 136 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 441
Write 102
Mixed 153
SusWrite 135
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 20
99% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 64
95% 185 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VJFE52F11X-XXXXXX Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE52F11X-XXXXXX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback