Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD EVO (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101116
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '22 at 23:55
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 51.8 2-Core 105 54% 82.8 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 187 27% 196 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 22F7) CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.8.1 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.5% Below average	Lighting 40.9 Reflection 59.7 Parallax 66.4 33% 55.7 fps	MRender 58.7 Gravity 45.5 Splatting 43.4 40% 49.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC064MAG 64GB 1,591 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 64 49 57 54 53 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.2% Below average	Read 245 Write 73.3 Mixed 23 SusWrite 55 22% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 7.1 60% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 30.8 DQ Write 63.8 DQ Mixed 14.2 20% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 53%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 30GB free Firmware: 04.04V06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 79 80 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 92 Write 92.2 Mixed 66 SusWrite 79.6 61% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.3 232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	34.8% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 12.9 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 10 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	36x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	25x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	6x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	6x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	4x
F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 5 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $241

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359