Intel MPAD-MSAE Customer Reference Boards

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemIntel Calistoga & ICH7M Chipset
MotherboardIntel MPAD-MSAE Customer Reference Boards  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 19:53
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Duo T2350
U1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 19.2
2-Core 38
30% 40 Pts
4-Core 38.3
8-Core 38.2
5% 38.2 Pts
64-Core 38.5
2% 38.5 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7400
Quanta(152D 0753) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7948
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.6
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.22%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 30 31 33 29 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 35.6
Mixed 25
SusWrite 29.4
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
1024, 512 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
11% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPAD-MSAE Customer Reference Boards Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Intel MPAD-MSAE Customer Reference Boards

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback