Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 85.5 1-Core 81.9 2-Core 149 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 182 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK5076GSX 500GB-$54 7,200 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 428GB free (System drive) Firmware: GS001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 62 60 63 61 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 34.5 Write 21.5 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 60.6 24% 33.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 42%
USB DISK 30X 16GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 3GB free, PID 1d00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.7 2.1 2.1 1.6 3.3 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.35% Terrible	Read 12 Write 10.5 Mixed 4 SusWrite 2.3 9% 7.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 23% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.35% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19B 1x4GB 569 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 9.9 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10.3 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	193x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	59x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	24x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,522 samples	19x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	14x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19B 2x4GBAdataBench 52%, 544 samples	11x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16