Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Chuwi HeroBook Pro+ (all builds)
Motherboard	CHUWI HeroBook Pro+
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '22 at 10:40
Run Duration	248 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 375 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Memory 19.2 1-Core 32.2 2-Core 60.4 21% 37.3 Pts	4-Core 48.8 8-Core 55.2 7% 52 Pts	64-Core 106 6% 106 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E63 002E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.74% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 1.6 0% 0.93 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.1 1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.74% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teutons Iridium M.2 SSD 128GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 105GB free Firmware: Q1205B SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 57 47 59 58 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 342 Write 280 Mixed 294 SusWrite 73.6 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 11.8 52% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 77.7 DQ Write 77.4 DQ Mixed 30.8 36% 62 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 327 12% 327 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 26%, 375 samples	7x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	9x

SSD
Iridium M.2 SSD 128GBTeutonsBench 47%, 28 samples	3x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	1x
TM8PS7128G 128GBTeamBench 61%, 1,941 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	9x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16