Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus Z10PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150317
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateSep 25 '17 at 00:31
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 151
57% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 617
52% 450 Pts
64-Core 1,891
117% 1,891 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.33
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 77.7
Reflection 91.7
Parallax 109
63% 93 fps
Gravity 52.7
Splatting 78.9
60% 65.8 fps
Poor: 70% Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 497
Write 396
Mixed 195
80% 363 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 26
102% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 50.4
60% 106 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 81%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965589-007.D01G 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 11.9
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 7.2
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback