Gigabyte GA-X570 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics179% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 UD  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 20 '22 at 10:39
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 65.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 248
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 885
81% 680 Pts
64-Core 1,470
91% 1,470 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Palit(1569 2206) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
179% Outstanding
Lighting 254
Reflection 230
Parallax 259
207% 248 fps
MRender 301
Gravity 223
Splatting 169
182% 231 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 179%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 955 866 861 848 849 745 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,059
Write 1,706
Mixed 1,696
SusWrite 854
354% 1,579 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 67
226% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,113
DQ Write 514
DQ Mixed 702
550% 776 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 241%
Great: 346%
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40
156GB free
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 146 153 85 161 102 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.4% Poor
Read 187
Write 126
Mixed 163
SusWrite 130
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 4.2
16% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 76%
Revuahn 900G 512GB
175GB free
Firmware: Q0922DS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 328 348 338 357 349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 390
Write 312
Mixed 305
SusWrite 331
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 12
41% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 132
105% 147 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
998GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 104 101 109 126 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 89.2
Write 119
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 111
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-2666 CL19-19-19 D4-2666 CL19-19-19 D4-2666 CL16-18-18 D4-2666 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.2% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 26.4
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 25.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 UD Builds (Compare 1,725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 UD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback