Viglen VIG644M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemViglen VIG644M  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI H61M-P31/W8 (MS-7788)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '22 at 06:37
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 164
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 317
42% 317 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Dell(1028 1083) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 8.4
6% 6.53 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08351
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 152 29 32 32 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.8% Above average
Read 237
Write 90.5
Mixed 233
SusWrite 80.9
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 28.4
102% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 113
103% 157 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273CH0-YH9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VIG644M Builds (Compare 665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Viglen VIG644M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $480
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback