Gigabyte GA-EP43T-UD3L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics171% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP43T-UD3L  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '22 at 03:57
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 96.3
48% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 190
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
171% Outstanding
Lighting 234
Reflection 234
Parallax 279
191% 249 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 231
Splatting 167
185% 236 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 171%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 203 210 123 123 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.1% Above average
Read 167
Write 203
Mixed 203
SusWrite 158
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 38.2
121% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 40.6
DQ Write 77.1
DQ Mixed 48.8
40% 55.5 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 137%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power128 124GB
49GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 3.7 5.4 5.4 4.9 5.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.4
Write 9
SusWrite 5.3
13% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EP43T-UD3L Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP43T-UD3L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback