Asrock H110M-DGS R3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DGS R3.0  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160914
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateMar 19 '22 at 18:02
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 187
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 318
37% 287 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
ASRock(1849 5912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 7
5% 5.4 fps
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.45 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK60A9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 26 31 18 20 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 47.1
Write 164
Mixed 51
SusWrite 43.5
17% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 24.1
107% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 16.5
60% 131 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
123GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 79 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 97.3
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 84.4
65% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
144GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 159 185 185 184 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 146
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 175
96% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
pqi IntelligentStick 8GB
5GB free, PID 0059
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.8 6.6 6.6 7.3 7.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
7.44% Terrible
Read 25.1
Write 1.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 6.5
10% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
41% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.44%
Great: 10%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
421GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 34 41 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 39.4
Write 40.6
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 39.8
51% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.9
277% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 14
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DGS R3.0 Builds (Compare 1,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DGS R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback