Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte A320MA-M.2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '22 at 15:06
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 226
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 569
63% 498 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1436 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Lighting 72
Reflection 65
Parallax 97.6
59% 78.2 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 83.6
Splatting 49.2
53% 66.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0B- 240GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 17 50 35 43 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 331
Write 330
Mixed 257
SusWrite 56.3
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 11.9
57% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 47.1
DQ Write 66.8
DQ Mixed 21.5
26% 45.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 42%
Amd-raid Array 2 479GB
445GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 921 924 951 940 944 955 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 651
Write 179
Mixed 572
SusWrite 939
132% 586 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 28.6
121% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 647
DQ Mixed 180
202% 326 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 138%
Great: 162%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 28.6
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 27.6
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320MA-M.2-CF Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback