Lenovo 435257U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 435257U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '22 at 01:28
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 145
56% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 280
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 410
Nvidia(10DE 094A) 512MB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 388.16
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
2.66% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 3.9
2% 3.37 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.1
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.66%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
616GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 399 390 400 413 413 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 418
Write 351
Mixed 315
SusWrite 398
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 32.9
106% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 295
217% 287 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 125%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 713GB
274GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 91 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 134
Write 81.1
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 91.8
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
189% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C HMT351U7CFR8C CT51264BA160B CT51264BA160B 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.5% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 20.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 435257U Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 435257U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback