Toshiba SATELLITE C70-C-1CR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 27% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C70-C-1CR  (all builds)
MotherboardFF40 0681
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '22 at 19:33
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 27%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 86
2-Core 137
59% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 197
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F832) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 1
Parallax 4.8
3% 3 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD-480GB 480GB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 121 32 68 66 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 444
Write 358
Mixed 299
SusWrite 102
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 10.8
56% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 45.3
DQ Write 13.2
DQ Mixed 14.7
15% 24.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C70-C-1CR Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C70-C-1CR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback