Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	122.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '17 at 16:49
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 76.8 1-Core 131 2-Core 261 85% 156 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 821 80% 657 Pts	64-Core 1,076 67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 115 Parallax 98.6 90% 108 fps	MRender 97.8 Gravity 97.4 Splatting 101 81% 98.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 927GB free Firmware: MU04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18460 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 674 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 139 (B4) Unknown 0 0 10392 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 57 184684445728 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 9713891087 (F7) Unknown 100 100 303649790 (F8) Unknown 100 100 17034488	92.9% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 396 Mixed 372 95% 426 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 89.8 4K Mixed 25 124% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 31.6 86% 181 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 104%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 874GB free Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 229 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 41 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 71 55 193274904605 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2309400049 (F7) Unknown 100 100 72217843 (F8) Unknown 100 100 10485342 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4411 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	86.9% Excellent	Read 482 Write 336 Mixed 341 86% 386 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 75.2 4K Mixed 27.4 113% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 52.7 103% 210 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 105%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 434GB free Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	269% Outstanding	Read 2,236 Write 1,402 Mixed 1,388 370% 1,675 MB/s	4K Read 59.5 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 51.3 235% 86.6 MB/s	DQ Read 674 DQ Write 407 DQ Mixed 228 254% 436 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 269% Great: 254%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154 14,088 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 398GB free Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	153% Outstanding	Read 1,502 Write 535 Mixed 679 198% 905 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 89.6 4K Mixed 22.1 138% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 597 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 51.5 146% 321 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 155%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 370GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 307 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 78 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 61 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5099864373	120% Outstanding	Read 524 Write 495 Mixed 511 114% 510 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 46.9 173% 64.4 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 171 180% 297 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 124%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$233 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 7.5TB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 79 65 73786004 (03) Spinup time 88 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 73 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 83460600 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -55005646159541 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 73 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 81 81 19 (BE) vendor-specific 68 61 572194848 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1618 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2571 (C2) HDA temperature 32 40 94489280544 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 9 6 73786004 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 81849191760162 (F1) Unknown 100 253 40218461563 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1685218591
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$233 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 7TB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 74 64 24218201 (03) Spinup time 88 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 73 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 82165973 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -59060095286969 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 73 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 70 64 555417630 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1949 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2594 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 98784247838 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 9 7 24218201 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 95893734818077 (F1) Unknown 100 253 36732937177 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1065959259
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate SkyHawk 10TB (2016)-$244 71 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 5TB free Firmware: AV01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 72 64 17584000 (03) Spinup time 88 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 75 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 90121565 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 124137439756653 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 75 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 90 90 10 (BE) vendor-specific 70 62 555417630 (BF) G-sense error rate 99 99 2240 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2619 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 94489280542 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 10 7 17584000 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -58407260257982 (F1) Unknown 100 253 53163927463 (F2) Unknown 100 253 16093627787
Poor: 32% Great: 109%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 206 197 8666 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 85 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 333 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 83 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 540 (C2) HDA temperature 122 117 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	67.6% Good	Read 142 Write 93.2 Mixed 101 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.24 83% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 8x16GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	92.8% Outstanding	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 54.8 MC Mixed 30.3 105% 36.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 10.1 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 138%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	181x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	134x
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	69x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,123

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16