Acer Swift SF315-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Swift SF315-41  (all builds)
MotherboardRR Becks_RR
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 18 '22 at 10:26
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 43.1
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 77.3
34% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 246
24% 200 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Acer(1025 1233) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 7.2
4% 6 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hfs256g3 9TND-N210A 256GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 212 168 192 252 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 372
Write 244
Mixed 188
SusWrite 221
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 17.6
65% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 126
97% 133 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 87%
Seagate USB 250GB
220GB free, PID a313
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 202 201 183 182 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 202
Mixed 209
SusWrite 190
278% 204 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 16.8
1,297% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 24.2
DQ Mixed 19.9
1,568% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 137%
Great: 160%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 1333 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20.3
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF315-41 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF315-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback