Supermicro SYS-5038MD-H24TRF-OS012

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro SYS-5038MD-H24TRF-OS012  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SDE-DF
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180613
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 17 '22 at 20:49
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon D-1531
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 133
58% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 488
49% 400 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 301 302 303 302 303 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 448
Mixed 377
SusWrite 318
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 53.2
184% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 349
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
159GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 303 305 307 307 307 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 455
Mixed 380
SusWrite 320
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 55
190% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 350
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ADF2G72AZ-2G3A1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.9% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 22.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 14.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback