Hp-pavilion WC846AA-ABE HPE-140es

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion WC846AA-ABE HPE-140es  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI IONA
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100625
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 21:59
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 60
2-Core 103
49% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 346
36% 287 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
240G 120GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1230C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 148 77 63 79 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.4% Average
Read 240
Write 229
Mixed 219
SusWrite 107
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 18.3
69% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 176
135% 182 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 48%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
84GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 83 84 84 83 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 63.4
Write 93.2
Mixed 61
SusWrite 83.6
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M391B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.5% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WC846AA-ABE HPE-140es Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Hp-pavilion WC846AA-ABE HPE-140es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $457
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback