Asrock P43DE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock P43DE  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 21:27
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 29.3
2-Core 63.5
39% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 63.1
8-Core 59.9
8% 61.5 Pts
64-Core 62.3
4% 62.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6610 XL
MSI(1462 9790) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.27% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.27%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 47 43 32 60 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 13.6
Write 42.3
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 46.4
24% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 58%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.7 4.1 4.3 4.9 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Read 7.3
Write 5.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.5
7% 5.35 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
21.4% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P43DE Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock P43DE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback