HP 255 G6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 19 months ago.
SystemHP 255 G6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8330
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200619
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 17:13
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-9000e APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 47.5
1-Core 36.9
2-Core 46.2
29% 43.5 Pts
4-Core 38.5
8-Core 39
5% 38.8 Pts
64-Core 37.1
2% 37.1 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 8330) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.10.44.02
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.93 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 141 158 183 201 203 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 371
Write 334
Mixed 343
SusWrite 190
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 31.6
108% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 95
DQ Write 66.2
DQ Mixed 74.6
57% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 128%
WDC WD10JPVX-60J 1TB
553GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 18 21 21 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 21.6
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 21.1
30% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255 G6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback