Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3500PC_K3500PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3500PC_K3500PC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X3500PC
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 14:43
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 73
1-Core 156
2-Core 247
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 704
71% 577 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 193C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.5% Above average
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 68.7
62% 71.6 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 58.9
Splatting 50.4
48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1505 1550 767 5.6 10 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,179
Write 1,244
Mixed 1276
SusWrite 642
296% 1,335 MB/s
4K Read 77.4
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 92.2
330% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 441
DQ Write 1,060
DQ Mixed 406
408% 636 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 261%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 22
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 19.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3500PC_K3500PC Builds (Compare 546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X3500PC_K3500PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback