Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X540MA_D540MA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X540MA_D540MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X540MA
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191001
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 08:53
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 40.4
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 102
38% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 110
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 1261) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8587
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.1
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 46 58 83 91 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47% Average
Read 91
Write 92.4
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 72.6
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
113% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47%
Great: 67%
FLASH Drive SM_USB20 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Read 26.9
Write 5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.8
10% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 8%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 12 11 12 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.1
Write 15.5
SusWrite 11.8
19% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
28% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K4F8E304HB-MGCj 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X540MA_D540MA Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X540MA_D540MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback