Koloe X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardKoloe X58  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 05:00
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 143
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 468
46% 378 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36B9) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 44
Parallax 39.5
34% 41.6 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 34.6
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
901GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 160 143 121 157 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 166
Write 160
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 147
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 109%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 16GB
10GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 10 10 10 13 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 23.7
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 11.4
30% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
83% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter 9.A01LF MXIC 25L8005 41GB
1896, 33 MHz
8192, 33792 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
26.4% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 7
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback