Powerspec G_Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPowerspec G_Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X79 Professional
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130724
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 04:58
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 95.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 187
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 604
60% 488 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 123
Parallax 160
90% 131 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 114
Splatting 82.3
78% 97.5 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
582GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 59 59 75 77 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 83.2
Write 28.4
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 63.7
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
109GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 98 102 145 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68% Good
Read 122
Write 126
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 115
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
22GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 52 52 52 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 50.1
Write 54.2
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 52.1
38% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 500GB
454GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 85 87 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 81.6
Write 85.2
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 86.2
104% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 40.5
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 14.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 106%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G_Series Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: Powerspec G_Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback