Daktech Gemini 67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDaktech Gemini 67  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110815
Uptime14.9 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 02:21
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$190
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 160
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 370
41% 322 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.7 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 474
Write 422
Mixed 330
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 43.2
146% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 358
265% 349 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
187GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 71 70 72 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 119
Write 79.8
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 59.6
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA1339J.M8F Kingston 9965413-002.A00LF Kingston 9965413-002.A00LF CT51264BA1339J.M8F 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gemini 67 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Daktech Gemini 67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback