Acer Aspire X3-100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire X3-100  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X3475
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 01:14
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 108
48% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 166
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
Acer(1025 070A) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 6.8
0% 5.27 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 6.9
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 41 48 27 23 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 9.9
Write 10
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 33.5
14% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 114%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
244GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 33.9
Write 25.9
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 19.5
36% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
162% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB
92GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 17 18 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 28.2
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 17.5
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 18%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
8GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 32 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 34.9
Write 31.9
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 30.5
40% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR512X64D3U16C11G ACR512X64D3U16C11G Unifosa HU564404EP0200 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.5% Poor
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 10
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.7
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X3-100 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3-100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback