Lenovo 4354C3G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 4354C3G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory21.8 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 00:47
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 169
52% 96.4 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 620
56% 474 Pts
64-Core 1,568
97% 1,568 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 300
HP(103C 0862) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 22 22 62 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 233
Write 185
Mixed 196
SusWrite 54.1
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 16.8
68% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 120
105% 155 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 85%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
931GB free
Firmware: 00.0NS03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 130 129 121 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 144
Write 127
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 128
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- 7x4GB
7 of 16 slots used
28GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 57
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 45.6
143% 50.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.9
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 118%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4354C3G Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 4354C3G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback