HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8906
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMar 14 '22 at 17:49
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Memory 81.9
1-Core 164
2-Core 287
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 1,089
103% 855 Pts
64-Core 1,530
95% 1,530 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 99%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
HP(103C 88D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 178
Parallax 172
154% 179 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 140
Splatting 118
120% 151 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 134%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1325 1350 1325 1350 1348 1344 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 1,484
Write 1,322
Mixed 1,273
SusWrite 1,340
305% 1,355 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 81.4
272% 94.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,354
DQ Write 1,192
DQ Mixed 1,280
958% 1,275 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 282%
Great: 410%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
560GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 144 146 147 143 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 129
Mixed 89
SusWrite 145
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 109%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 223 219 225 223 231 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 239
Write 216
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 224
142% 194 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
ASMedia AS2115 2TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Read 2.2
Write 1.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 1.9
2% 1.83 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 20.1
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx Builds (Compare 4,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback