DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '22 at 14:39
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 125
54% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 269
28% 225 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5870
AMD(1002 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 20
Parallax 24.8
22% 24.1 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 11.2
12% 15.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
805GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 232 168 195 171 179 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.1% Average
Read 194
Write 236
Mixed 170
SusWrite 188
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 17.5
62% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 127
114% 172 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 107%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
2TB free
Firmware: 1AN10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 109 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 73.8
Write 44.8
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 109
54% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
2TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 6
Write 31.6
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 66.6
59% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 51%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB
931GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 67 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 87.9
Write 75.5
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 66.7
94% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
106% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 15.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback