Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	42.1% Average	Memory 56.4 1-Core 28.9 2-Core 49.2 31% 44.8 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 203 23% 179 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% EVGA(3842 1313) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.93% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 0.2 1% 0.53 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.93% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 45 50 44 44 44 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21% Poor	Read 160 Write 54.8 Mixed 178 SusWrite 53.6 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 9.9 37% 9.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.5% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 12.7 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.9 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

SSD
Green 240GB (2016)WDBench 53%, 20,831 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 8GBSamsungBench 28%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $70