Toshiba Satellite C850-BMK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite C850-BMK  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 14 '22 at 02:24
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 137
61% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 195
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.87 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 120GB-$30
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0704A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 378 380 377 373 371 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 461
Write 372
Mixed 384
SusWrite 374
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 24.7
105% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 48.2
98% 192 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 95%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
107GB free
Firmware: ES2OA70K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 71 71 70 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 63.1
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 70.2
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C850-BMK Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C850-BMK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $82
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback