ECS H61H2-MV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardECS H61H2-MV  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131127
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 22:57
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 91
2-Core 157
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 233
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E194) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.63% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 7.1
7% 8.3 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.63%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c87
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 54 77 31 68 49 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.1% Average
Read 246
Write 101
Mixed 165
SusWrite 59.8
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 22
75% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 49.9
DQ Mixed 92.9
69% 93.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF Hynix DMT451E6AFR8C-PB 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-MV Builds (Compare 940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-MV - $189

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback