Alienware M15x

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware M15x  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 19:57
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 42.9
2-Core 78.5
46% 67.6 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 210
22% 175 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260M
Dell(1028 02A2) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 2.6
6% 6.4 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 3.5
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 64GB 64GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 43 44 44 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.3% Poor
Read 101
Write 52.9
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 43.3
15% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 16.8
54% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 67.6
DQ Write 53.6
DQ Mixed 37.9
34% 53 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 80AD HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M15x Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback